• Modern Maks are much like Schmidt-Cassegrains. They have a spherical mirror to collect light and a curved lens up front to correct for aberrations. But the corrector lens on a Mak has a simple spherical curve which is easy to manufacture. And the secondary mirror is simply a thin layer of aluminum deposited on the back of the lens. So unlike a Newtonian or Schmidt, a Mak requires no alignment.
• The downside of the Mak's optics? To keep aberrations small, Maks are made with a long focal ratio… typically f/12 to f/15. That means you get a higher magnification with a particular eyepiece and a narrower field of view than with an f/10 Schmidt or f/6 Newtonian. (See Easy Math for a review of how this works).
• So Maks aren't great if you want wide, sweeping views of the Milky Way. They're much better for objects that require high magnification like planets, the Moon, double stars, globular clusters, and planetary nebulae.
|